IG Review for India 2026: RBI Alert List, Regulation, Login, and Forex Risk
IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The UK regulator classified the website as a clone of an authorised firm on 28 August 2026. The FCA says the genuine Reclaim Experts Ltd has no connection with the clone.

The UK regulator classified the website as a clone of an authorised firm on 28 August 2026. The FCA says the genuine Reclaim Experts Ltd has no connection with the clone.
| Field | Verified detail |
| Regulator | Financial Conduct Authority (United Kingdom) |
| Clone name | reclaim-experts.com |
| Domain involved | reclaim-experts.com — do not visit from the article |
| Warning date | 28 August 2026; last updated the same day |
| Authorisation status | Not FCA-authorised; classified as a clone firm |
| Genuine firm | Reclaim Experts Ltd, FRN 1030701; FCA-listed site: reclaimexperts.co.uk |
| Main risk | Impersonation; no UK Ombudsman or FSCS protection when dealing with the clone |
FCA warns reclaim-experts.com is a clone firm in a notice first published and last updated on 28 August 2026. The Financial Conduct Authority says the website is not authorised, has contacted people while pretending to be an authorised business, and has no connection with the genuine Reclaim Experts Ltd. The confirmed risk is therefore impersonation, not a routine service complaint. Anyone who received a payment-recovery or financial-services approach using this domain should pause before sending money, identity documents or login credentials.
The regulator lists the clone name and domain as reclaim-experts.com and gives a telephone number beginning +44 28. This clone firm warning explains that fraudsters can mix genuine company information with false email addresses, phone numbers, postal addresses or Firm Reference Numbers. Those contact details can also change over time, so matching one item is not enough to prove legitimacy.
The FCA separately identifies the genuine authorised business as Reclaim Experts Ltd, Firm Reference Number 1030701, with the official website reclaimexperts.co.uk. The notice states that the genuine firm has no connection with the clone. This difference—a hyphenated .com domain versus the FCA-listed .co.uk address—is precisely why users should open the regulators record themselves rather than trust a link supplied in a message.
Confirmed facts are narrow but serious: the FCA published the notice on 28 August; it classifies the named domain as a clone; the domain is not authorised by the FCA; and the authorised company is not connected to it. In other words, the page presents an unauthorised financial firm using identity details associated with a genuine business. The regulator also says people dealing with the clone would not have access to the UK Financial Ombudsman Service for complaints and would not receive Financial Services Compensation Scheme protection if things go wrong.
The notice does not identify the people operating the site, publish a victim count, quantify losses, or confirm any specific withdrawal failure, frozen account or successful recovery claim. It says the clone has targeted people in the UK. It does not establish that users in India, Indonesia or Pakistan were targeted. Those gaps should not be filled with social-media allegations. They are unknowns, not evidence that the risk is smaller.
Clone sites exploit a familiar trust shortcut: a real company name appears in search results, so the caller seems genuine. Cross-border users can face an additional problem because a UK-looking phone number or address may appear credible even when the payment request comes through WhatsApp, Telegram, crypto, a personal bank account or a different beneficiary name.
Jurisdiction also matters. An FCA warning is authoritative for the firm‘s UK authorisation claim, but it does not automatically describe remedies available in another country. The payment recovery risk rises when a caller asks for a second ’release‘, ’tax‘, ’verification‘ or ’recovery fee to unlock money already sent. If you are outside the UK, contact your bank or payment provider immediately and use the reporting channel of your local regulator or cybercrime authority.
1. Start from the FCA Firm Checker, not a link in an email, advertisement or chat. Search the legal name and Firm Reference Number yourself.
2. Match every contact detail. Compare the domain, telephone, email and postal address with the regulators record; one matching company name is insufficient.
3. Inspect the full domain character by character. Hyphens, extra words and a different top-level domain can separate a clone from the authorised firm.
4. Call the authorised firm using the number shown on the FCA record. Ask whether the named representative, invoice and bank account are genuine.
5. Verify the beneficiary before paying. Stop if the recipient is a personal account, an unrelated company, a crypto wallet, or a name that differs from the contract.
6. Protect access credentials. Never disclose one-time passwords, remote-access codes, seed phrases or screen-sharing control to someone offering recovery help.
7. Test withdrawals without adding new money. A demand for another deposit, tax or unlock fee is a stop signal; save screenshots and contact your bank promptly.
The FCA warns reclaim-experts.com is not the authorised Reclaim Experts Ltd and classifies the domain as a clone. The safest next step is to stop contact, verify the genuine firm through the FCAs own checker, and alert the payment provider if money or data has already been sent. This is a fresh regulatory action dated 28 August 2026, but it does not prove every allegation circulating online. Use the confirmed notice, the listed domain difference and the seven checks above—not reviews or messages supplied by the caller.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.

Orbex, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, has recorded 30 exposure complaints on WikiFX, a leading forex broker regulation inquiry tool, so far. Other review websites have also recorded a healthy number of complaints against the brokerage firm. These complaints largely talk about the alleged profit confiscations by the broker in the name of trading violations, difficulty in accessing fund withdrawals, capital losses due to artificial slippage, etc. In this Orbex review, we have investigated user complaints and provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

FCA warns Swift TradeX in a notice first published and updated on 1 September 2026. The UK Financial Conduct Authority says the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission, is not authorised, and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice names the website swifttradexai.com, a Worcester address and a UK telephone number, but also cautions that unauthorised businesses may use incorrect or borrowed contact details. The confirmed issue is authorisation status—not a court finding about every transaction. Anyone considering a payment should stop, verify the firm independently, and avoid using contact information supplied by the platform itself.

ThinkMarkets review for India: check the RBI Alert List, overseas entities, regulation, login security, forex rules, costs, withdrawals, and leverage risk.