RM330,000 Invested, Only RM35,000 Comes Back
Abstract:A 47-year-old engineer has reported losing RM330,000 after an investment arrangement failed to deliver the returns he had been promised, with only RM35,000 returned despite a series of payments made over several years.

A 47-year-old engineer has reported losing RM330,000 after an investment arrangement failed to deliver the returns he had been promised, with only RM35,000 returned despite a series of payments made over several years.
The man began investing in 2020 after being introduced to the scheme by a male friend who claimed to be an agent for the investment company. What began as an investment relationship eventually resulted in 10 separate transfers to the company, bringing the total amount committed to RM330,000.
During the entire period, the engineer received only one payment of RM35,000. No further returns were received despite the money that had already been transferred.
The apparent breakdown of communication added another layer to the case. The engineer was unable to reach either the friend who had introduced him to the scheme or the owner of the company, according to the report.
With the investment apparently no longer producing the returns that had been promised and attempts to contact the relevant parties unsuccessful, the engineer eventually approached the police. A report was lodged at Dang Wangi police station on Sept 19.
Dang Wangi acting district police chief Superintendent Nuzulan Mohd Din confirmed that police had received the report, according to The Vibes. The report did not provide further details on the identity of the investment company or whether any arrests had been made.
The RM35,000 payment also represents only a fraction of the RM330,000 transferred by the engineer. The difference between the amount paid into the scheme and the money subsequently received illustrates the financial exposure that can accumulate when investors continue committing funds without independently verifying the status of the underlying operation.
Investment fraud remains a significant concern in Malaysia, with regulators maintaining public databases intended to help investors identify unauthorised operators. The Securities Commission Malaysia says its Investor Alert List covers unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals, while warning that the list is not exhaustive.
Bank Negara Malaysia likewise maintains a Financial Consumer Alert List for entities and schemes that may be mistaken for, or appear to operate as, licensed or regulated financial providers. The central bank stresses that investors should conduct their own due diligence and that an entity's absence from the list should not automatically be treated as confirmation of regulatory approval.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.











