FCA Warning Capital Zodiac 7 September 2026 and Seven Checks Before Paying
The FCA named Capital Zodiac as an unauthorised clone on 7 September 2026. Check capitalzodiac.com, capitalzodiac.net and FRN 806702 before paying.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The failure occurred between June 2018 and February 2020. FINRA recently fined RBC Capital Markets $90k over anticipatory hedging violations.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has hit RBC Capital Markets, a Toronto-headquartered global investment bank, with a censure order and monetary fine of $360,000 for the failure of its supervisory system between June 2018 and February 2020.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The bank, whose principal place of business is in New York, the United States, provides securities transaction and clearance services to its customers and those of its introducing brokers.
FINRA, a membership-based self-regulatory body, said the penalty is for the company‘s failure to “timely or reasonably monitor thousands of employee outside brokerage account statements for compliance with the firm’s trading restrictions” within the period.
The restrictions relate to RBC Capital Markets policies on pre-clearance and holding periods, among others.
The private American regulator said the financial services provider contravened FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010 which demand the supervision of associated persons working for its members firms and also the maintenance of high standards in dealings.
Earlier in June, FINRA also slammed a censure order and a monetary penalty of $90,000 on RBC Capital Markets following Cboe Exchange's allegation of anticipatory hedging allegations against the company.
According to FINRA, RBC Capital Markets between June 2018 and February 2020 failed to put in place a reasonably designed supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures, to timely review paper statements from employees' outside accounts.
“For example, the firm had no prescribed timeframe to track, reconcile, and review statements. As a result, and due to the manual nature of the paper statement review process, personnel turnover, and outdated technology systems, as of February 2020, the firm had a backlog of approximately 8,950 unreviewed account statements, with some dating as far back as June 2018,” FINRA explained.
The review of the backlog was not completed until February 2021, FINRA said.
The financial watchdog further disclosed that RBC Capital Markets manually tracked receipt of paper statements, had no system in place to notify the firm or employees that statements were missing, and had no procedure for following up on missing statements.
“As a result, in some instances, the firm did not receive paper statements for review. For example, after the firm identified the backlog of unreviewed statements described above, it discovered that approximately 2,600 additional statements had not been mailed to the firm,” the markets supervisor said.
Meanwhile, FINRA recently slapped a $100,000 fine on Dealerweb Inc., an operator of an electronic interdealer platform for mortgage-backed securities.
Dealerweb inaccurately reported approximately 180,000 transactions in TRACE-eligible securities to the FINRA Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) between July 2016 and December 2020, the regulator said.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA named Capital Zodiac as an unauthorised clone on 7 September 2026. Check capitalzodiac.com, capitalzodiac.net and FRN 806702 before paying.

This WEALTH-FX review starts with a licensing statement that needs verification. The client agreement on wealth-fx.com says the company is incorporated in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as 88102 LLC 2021 and is authorised and regulated by the SVG FSA. An official SVG FSA notice, however, says forex trading brokerage activities are not licensed in that jurisdiction. The same agreement separately names WealthFX Liquidity Limited, company 180782, and describes a Mauritius International License. For an India-based reader, those website claims do not replace RBI rules for permitted forex transactions or an independently confirmed licence record.

Did ePlanet, a Comoros-based brokerage, allegedly withhold your dollars on the platform? Did the broker prevent you from accessing the ePlanet login dashboard upon a withdrawal request? Did the broker platform execute trade orders slowly? Have you faced losses due to slippage? This ePlanet review 2026 evaluates user claims while also providing a regulatory overview of the broker.

FCA warns EXOTICINVEST in a notice first published and updated on 3 September 2026. The UK regulator identifies EXOTICINVEST TRADING AND INVESTMENT FIRM and the website www.exoticinvest.ltd, stating that the firm is not authorised and may be targeting people in the UK. This is a dated regulatory warning, not a customer review or a confirmed loss report. Anyone approached through the named website should stop before paying, avoid sharing login credentials and verify the exact business independently through the FCA Firm Checker.