Abstract：Two public complaints raise different questions about account funds. A Pakistan-labelled RoboForex post dated 9 July 2026 alleges removal of $1,627.39 and blocked profile access. A Malaysia-labelled Trading Pro post dated 15 August 2024 describes a rejected withdrawal followed by a deduction. Their attached images preserve narrower observations: a displayed balance in the first case and a declined transaction in the second. Comparing the evidence helps readers identify what remains unverified, without ranking the brokers or treating either account as a proven fraud case.
Two public complaints raise different questions about account funds. A Pakistan-labelled RoboForex post dated 9 July 2026 alleges removal of $1,627.39 and blocked profile access. A Malaysia-labelled Trading Pro post dated 15 August 2024 describes a rejected withdrawal followed by a deduction. Their attached images preserve narrower observations: a displayed balance in the first case and a declined transaction in the second. Comparing the evidence helps readers identify what remains unverified, without ranking the brokers or treating either account as a proven fraud case.
ContentsThe RoboForex photograph shows $1,627.39 in the balance, equity and free-margin fields. Adding those figures together would count the same displayed amount three times. It does not show a before-and-after adjustment or demonstrate whether the figure represents deposits, realised profit or a combination.
The TradingPRO transaction-history image shows a withdrawal marked declined. A rejection status describes a request, whereas a balance reduction describes the ledger. The image does not establish the reason for rejection or a reliable loss amount. These are different evidential questions, so a combined total loss would be unsupported.
The available records support reporting specific user allegations and describing the visible attachments. They do not establish a court finding, authenticate the complete account histories or determine the final payment outcomes. A risk assessment should retain those limits rather than replace them with a binary safe-or-scam verdict.
The two posts are not a representative sample of all clients. They cannot support a withdrawal failure rate, a comparison of customer treatment across South Asia or a claim that one broker is safer than the other. The displayed country labels identify these source records; they do not make the Malaysian complaint an Indian case.
A Trading Pro regulation search leads to an FCA warning dated 26 June 2025 naming Trading PRO / TradingPRO and tradingpro.com. Its UK authorisation scope must remain explicit. It is a separate source, not a decision resolving the earlier Malaysian transaction.
RoboForex‘s own privacy-policy page identifies a legal entity and publishes an FSC licence number. A company disclosure has a different evidential role from a regulator’s warning. Neither source, on its own, establishes what happened to a particular withdrawal or whether a resident of India is eligible to use an overseas service.
For an alleged balance deduction, request the account statement spanning the change, including deposits, closed trades, adjustments and withdrawals. Match the disputed entry to a timestamp and the explanation supplied by the contractual entity. A photograph of one balance is a starting point, not a reconciliation.
For a rejected withdrawal, retain the request identifier, decision message and ledger entry showing whether the requested amount remained available or was returned. TradingPROs current FAQ lists possible rejection reasons, but it cannot retrospectively identify the cause of the 2024 case. A later payment receipt would be needed before describing the money as received.
A useful RoboForex review should distinguish the displayed balance from the alleged later adjustment. A useful Trading Pro review should distinguish a declined request from a final loss. Readers can then seek the missing records instead of relying on a screenshot caption, a marketing promise or a regulators name to answer the wrong question.
Original complaint / source date and location
Primary source: regulator or official disclosure
Source dated 2026-07-09; displayed location: Pakistan. Archived 30 September 2026; original page rechecked 3 October 2026. This is a historical case, not a new complaint today.
Capture of the original complaint page, not a broker-homepage substitute.
Publicly available original image, not recreated. The assessment is limited to what the image visibly supports.
The uploaded photograph shows balance, equity and free margin of 1,627.39. This photograph alone does not prove a subsequent deduction or identify the contractual entity.
Source dated 2024-08-15; displayed location: Malaysia. Archived 30 September 2026; original page rechecked 3 October 2026. This is a historical case, not a new complaint today.
Capture of the original complaint page, not a broker-homepage substitute.
https://www.wikifx.com/en/exposure/detail/202408151552550132.html
Publicly available original image, not recreated. The assessment is limited to what the image visibly supports.
The uploaded
shows a withdrawal marked declined. It does not establish the amount deducted or the final account balance.Original webpage capture dated 30 September 2026. The company disclosure was rechecked on 3 October 2026.
Official-page capture, 30 September 2026. Website disclosures are the publishers statements, not our independent audit of every licence.
https://roboforex.com/about/client/security-policy/
https://www.tradingpro.com/
Official-page capture, 30 September 2026. Website disclosures are the publishers statements, not our independent audit of every licence.
Note: Prepared on 3 October 2026 from two historical public complaints. This comparison introduces no new complaint and is not a broker ranking. Original screenshots were archived on 30 September 2026.
Download the WikiFX app for the latest forex updates, including in-depth forex broker investigation reports.
Knowledge pays at WikiFX.Every time you share a WikiFX article, you'll receive 50 Reward Points. Grow your rewards with every share and unlock exclusive gifts in the WikiFX Points Mall. Start earning today!
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Ethiopia's central bank has allocated $840 million for foreign exchange auctions in the second quarter of the 2026/27 fiscal year, according to a statement reported by CNBC Africa on Tuesday. The funds will be released in six batches through auctions held every two weeks, beginning October 13.
Greek authorities have arrested 17 people over an alleged cryptocurrency pyramid scheme that targeted more than 10,000 investors and collected around $9 million, according to a report by News Mobile. The case centres on an organisation called AT Team Greece, which investigators say presented itself as an artificial intelligence-focused association.
India is being hit by four shocks at once, according to a post on X published on Tuesday night: food, fuel, fertiliser and finance. The four numbers behind it are the ones worth checking. Monsoon rainfall running about 13% below normal and the weakest since 2015. Crude oil near $100 a barrel. None of them has been confirmed. The post attributes the framing to External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar. Nothing published about Jaishankar in the past 72 hours mentions a four-F warning. Treat the attribution as unverified. What is verifiable is the timing. The post went out hours before an RBI policy decision, with Brent already slipping below $100 and US equity futures sitting at records. That split matters more to a USD/INR position than the label does. The four numbers, one at a time Everything in this section comes from the post. Food. El Niño left this year's monsoon about 13% short, the weakest since 2015, which points to lower crop harvests. Fuel. The US-Iran war has kept crude
Did your deposit fail to show on the FBS platform? Were you denied fund withdrawals by the Belize-based brokerage firm? Faced an unaccounted fund deduction from your trading account? Did you face losses due to the incorrect triggering of your stop-loss order on the FBS login? These issues have allegedy become widespread among users worldwide, and some of them have reported the same on broker evaluation platforms such as WikiFX. This FBS review 2026 investigates reported issues while providing an overview of the broker's regulatory status.
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
