amari Capital

Based on the latest data, amari Capital is not regulated by any recognized financial authority and has a low overall risk control index (2.75) and core score (2.01). These factors indicate that the broker is not considered safe and reliable. Users should exercise extreme caution.

No, amari Capital is not regulated. Its regulatory status is listed as 'Not Regulated' and it holds no active licenses from any financial authority.

The minimum deposit depends on the account type: for the Standard account it is $100, and for the ECN account it is $10,000.

amari Capital supports MT5 (full license) but does not support MT4.

Pros: Offers MT5 platform, ECN and Standard accounts with low spreads, high leverage up to 1:500, allows scalping and EA usage, and supports Islamic accounts. Cons: Not regulated by any major financial authority, has a low overall rating (2.01), and a user complaint about slippage causing losses has been reported.

Yes, there is at least one user complaint on record. A user reported multiple slippage events on January 26-27, 2026, which resulted in trading losses. No other complaints are currently publicly specified.

It is not publicly specified whether amari Capital offers services to US residents. Given its lack of regulation, it is unlikely to be licensed to operate in the United States.

amari Capital is not considered suitable for beginners due to its lack of regulation, low overall rating, and high risk profile. Beginners are generally advised to choose regulated brokers with stronger risk controls.

amari Capital offers two account types: ECN (minimum deposit $10,000, spread from 0.0) and Standard (minimum deposit $100, spread from 1.0). Both offer leverage up to 1:500, allow scalping, EA, and Islamic accounts. The main differences are the entry requirement and spread structure: ECN suits higher-volume traders with tighter spreads, while Standard is more accessible for retail traders.

amari Capital offers maximum leverage of 1:500. This is considered high leverage, which significantly amplifies both potential profits and losses. The risk is high, especially for inexperienced traders, and should be used with caution.

A cloned broker website refers to a fraudulent website that imitates the information of a legitimate broker. Such websites usually copy the real company's brand name, page design, and even regulatory information to mislead investors into making deposits. Common features include: a domain name highly similar to the official website (such as slight spelling differences), abnormal or unverifiable contact information, and promises of unusually high returns. Once funds enter such platforms, they are usually difficult to recover. Investors can identify potential risks by checking the official domain name, verifying regulatory information, and using WikiFX for cross-verification.

WikiFX is a third-party platform that provides forex broker information inquiry and risk alerts. This type of platform mainly integrates brokers' regulatory information, user feedback, and historical records, and conducts comprehensive evaluation through a multi-dimensional model to help investors quickly understand the broker's basic situation and potential risks. By using such tools, investors can conduct preliminary screening before choosing a broker, thereby reducing decision-making risks caused by information asymmetry.

When choosing a safe broker, investors should focus on key factors such as regulatory qualifications, fund security, and trading transparency. In general, priority should be given to platforms regulated by major regulatory authorities, such as the Financial Conduct Authority, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. At the same time, attention should also be paid to: whether client funds are kept in segregated accounts, whether the fee structure is transparent, and whether there are many negative complaints or withdrawal problems. By combining WikiFX ratings and user feedback, investors can evaluate broker risks more comprehensively.

If a broker holds multiple regulatory licenses, it usually means that it operates in multiple countries or regions and needs to comply with the requirements of different regulatory authorities. Its overall credibility is generally higher. However, it should be noted that regulatory strength differs between licenses. Some offshore regulations have weaker restrictions, so safety should not be judged only by the number of licenses. It is recommended to focus on whether the broker holds licenses from major regulators such as FCA or ASIC, and evaluate its regulatory status, historical records, and overall rating together. You can also check all regulatory information and performance under different regulators on the WikiFX platform to more comprehensively assess its actual risk level.

WikiFX ratings are calculated based on a multi-dimensional data model, mainly including five dimensions: regulatory index, license index, business index, risk control index, and software index. The rating adopts a range system (0-10 points). The higher the score, the higher the broker's overall performance level. In addition, ratings are dynamically updated according to regulatory changes, complaint handling results, and historical data performance, making the rating more objective and timely. You can check the scores of each dimension and their trends on the WikiFX platform to evaluate the broker's actual situation more comprehensively.