FCA Warning Capital Zodiac 7 September 2026 and Seven Checks Before Paying
The FCA named Capital Zodiac as an unauthorised clone on 7 September 2026. Check capitalzodiac.com, capitalzodiac.net and FRN 806702 before paying.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The LONGSHARK platform is facing access restrictions after being classified as an unauthorised website, amid the absence of financial regulation and a WikiFX rating of 1.11/10.

LONGSHARK, a trading platform operating under the domain longsharks.com, has recently drawn regulatory attention after being identified as an unauthorised broker. According to publicly available information, the platform does not hold any recognised financial licence and has been subject to regulatory action aimed at limiting investor exposure.

Data from WikiFX shows that LONGSHARK currently carries a score of 1.11 out of 10, reflecting significant concerns across key assessment categories. The platform is marked as “No Regulation”, with additional flags indicating a suspicious scope of business and questionable regulatory claims.
Notably, WikiFX also reports that LONGSHARK does not provide any verified trading software, a critical component for any legitimate brokerage operation. The absence of licensed trading infrastructure further undermines the platforms credibility and raises questions about how, or whether, trades are actually executed.
Beyond its low rating, LONGSHARK has been formally classified as an unauthorised website by regulators. Authorities have determined that the platform is offering investment-related services without the necessary legal approval, placing it outside the regulated financial system.
As a result, regulatory bodies have moved to order the blocking of access to the LONGSHARK website within their jurisdictions, a step typically taken when a platform is deemed to pose potential risks to the public.

Such access restriction measures are designed to prevent further onboarding of users and to limit the reach of unlicensed financial services. While technical implementation may take time, the issuance of a blocking order itself signals serious regulatory concern.
Based on available information from WikiFX and regulatory disclosures:
Cases like LONGSHARK highlight the importance of independently verifying a brokers regulatory status before engaging with any online trading platform. In an environment where professional-looking websites can be launched quickly, surface-level presentation alone is no longer a reliable indicator of legitimacy.
Platforms such as WikiFX compile regulatory data, licence records, and operational details from multiple jurisdictions, helping users identify whether a broker is authorised, how long it has operated, and whether basic infrastructure — such as trading software — is in place.
While no single tool replaces due diligence, access to consolidated, transparent information can help market participants better understand the regulatory standing of platforms like LONGSHARK before making any decisions.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA named Capital Zodiac as an unauthorised clone on 7 September 2026. Check capitalzodiac.com, capitalzodiac.net and FRN 806702 before paying.

This WEALTH-FX review starts with a licensing statement that needs verification. The client agreement on wealth-fx.com says the company is incorporated in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as 88102 LLC 2021 and is authorised and regulated by the SVG FSA. An official SVG FSA notice, however, says forex trading brokerage activities are not licensed in that jurisdiction. The same agreement separately names WealthFX Liquidity Limited, company 180782, and describes a Mauritius International License. For an India-based reader, those website claims do not replace RBI rules for permitted forex transactions or an independently confirmed licence record.

Did ePlanet, a Comoros-based brokerage, allegedly withhold your dollars on the platform? Did the broker prevent you from accessing the ePlanet login dashboard upon a withdrawal request? Did the broker platform execute trade orders slowly? Have you faced losses due to slippage? This ePlanet review 2026 evaluates user claims while also providing a regulatory overview of the broker.

This FTMO Global Markets review starts with a naming problem. The RBI Alert List updated 22 October 2024 names FTMO and links to ftmo.com/en at item 13. FTMO's current contact page separately lists FTMO Global Markets in Mauritius, company ID C187370 and licence GB21027119. Its January 2025 privacy policy describes FTMO Global Markets Ltd as a Mauritius investment dealer. These records do not prove RBI authorisation for the broker domain, and they do not justify treating every FTMO-branded service as the same product or legal entity.